Soul searching needed !!!
How long do we continue to shift blame on others?
How long do we continue to shift blame on others?
"If
someone has Enough Courage to ask you a question seriously, then you should be
Brave Enough to Answer truthfully" Cameron Milto
For
various reasons I did not write for some time. During this time wanton
bloodshed was profuse in Egypt and Syria. Those beating breast for democracy
ordered trampling of humans and Muslims under rolling tanks. Some Muslim
countries are part of this massacre. They provided more than 16 billion dollars
to the Egyptian military dictators to spill the blood of Muslims. Syria is no
exception. The Hadith says “If a
Muslim in the East is in pain, his coreligionist in the West has to be his
sympathizer.” What happened to this axiom?
Contrarily,
Muslim is seeking the blood of Muslim and using poisonous gas. Newly-wed brides
are minced under the tanks. Kids under impact of poisonous gas, die of
breathlessness. Yet the Muslims are tight lipped.
In
the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, human beings are torn to shreds by bombs
hurled in mosques, Imambaras and churches day in and day out. Communal clashes
were contrived in U.P resulting in loss of human lives and damage worth billion
of rupee of property.
We
the Muslims, instead of doing some souls searching tend to bring the onus of
these killings to the doorsteps of the US, Israel or India.
What
is happening in our small state? A national daily came out with the sensational
news that in its report the army’s inquiry committee had said “that in 2010
General V.K. Singh, the Army Chief had passed on 1.20 crore rupees to the
present Agriculture Minister Ghulam Hasan Mir for creating disturbed situation
in the State.” Commenting on the report, the former Army Chief said “that Mir
was a nationalist leader and doubting him is tantamount to doubting God”.
Ghulam Hasan Mir rubbished the entire episode as false and fabricated. But in a live interview to Times Now on 23 September,
former Amy Chief did not only defend passing on money to Mir but also added
that army has been passing on money not only to Mir but to many more ministers
in J&K.
Now
after General’s statement it is clear that the Army has been giving hundreds of
millions of rupees to the ministers to protect the interests of the army in
J&K.
No
wonder, many more besides the Ministers and bureaucrats would be receiving the
largess from the army. We can only imagine?
World
history has many instances of occupational armies providing largesse to local
agents and oppressed to subvert economy, culture and heritage of the oppressed people.
That is why when sections of Indian civil society beat the drum of democracy,
Kashmiris call it mere romanticism. Democracy may be in India but beyond
Lakhanpore there is no trace of it.
General
V.K. Singh’s revelation proves that India has not allowed her democratic
institutions grow in Kashmir. Some times a policeman removed Sheikh Abdullah
from power and put him behind bars, and at other times no fewer than thirty
assembly seats were filled unopposed. Some times Farooq Abdullah was removed
under a conspiracy and at other times in 1988 MUF was humiliated. In final
analysis, Kashmiris were convinced that economic backwardness, oppression,
incarceration and tyranny were the gifts of Indian democracy.
But
the question is why we should not make some introspection. Can we challenge Indian
institutions without making an introspection of our own doings? We took up gun
in 1989 without a proper plan and without a definite program. The then Jamat-e-Islami chief Sadu’d-Din had clearly rejected General Ziaul Haq’s proposal of
armed resistance. I too had opposed because international conditions and
Pakistan’s internal situation did facilitate it. With the unleashing of the gun
in 1988, a great movement came to fore. Unfortunately occupational forces on
both sides created no fewer than 150 armed groups and anybody speaking for the
nation was tortured and killed.
We stoked the flames of civil war and
contrived the liquidation of our youth in the name of freedom or accession.
Groups favoring accession to Pakistan embarked on killing other groups with
same program. Many outstanding intellectuals wear killed including a
venerable person like Maulvi Muhammad Farooq. Men like Dr. Guru, Mushiru’l-Huq,
Qazi Nisar, Adul Ghani Lone, Dr. Ghulam
Qadir Wani and Dr. Jalalu’d-Din and others were done away. Indian forces
captured arms and ammunition to the tune of 95 thousand AK rifles, 3500 machine
guns, and thousands of tons of ammunition either by killing the militants or
from surrendered militants.
The
surrendered militants thought of fighting the freedom war through slogans and
in this way the All Party Hurriyat came into existence. Unfortunately the Hurriyat,
too, had no concrete and definite plan for continuing the struggle. The
conglomerate partners began to have their own agenda to carry forward. Not only
that, they have been occasionally contradicting one another. Some organizations
distanced from the united structure and finally the Hurriyat got bifurcated
into two groups. Groups with same names comprise each of the two groups.
Instead of crushing the occupational forces, the two groups are eager to establish
their respective supremacy. People are aware of these things. The tragedy is
that if a member of one group received threats, he pulled out and joined the
other group. The reason was that General Musharraf was sometimes happy with one
group (Hurriyat M) and at other times with the other group (Hurriyat G). The
groups of Shabir Shah and Naeem Khan changed their affiliations between the two
groups, and these days they have distanced from both.
History
tells us that oppressed nations when engaged in freedom struggle have a
well-thought out plan of action and are disciplined through solid ideological
frame. They broach no confusion about their struggle and if there is more than
one organization with same objective, these forge strong unity. They need
advisory committees comprising intellectuals, scholars, astute politicians and seasoned
lawyers who help make long term plans. Unity among the leadership is of primary
importance. The bane of Kashmiri freedom struggle is that one who takes up his
pen or opens his mouth on this topic, is branded as an agent. In the agitation
of 2008, nearly sixty-four innocent lives were lost. People came out to vote in
large numbers for drinking water, electric power and roads. The result was that
Congress and National Conference made the coalition government. Resistance
leadership sat silently to wait for another episode.
In
2010, the martyrdom of Tufail Mattoo activated the resistance forces. About 117
lives were lost in that year’s disturbances. 2011 and 2012 were somewhat
peaceful and resistance forces passed into limbo. Except for sporadic slogan
raising or minor protest rally, there was no sign of the destination of the
freedom struggle. Recurrent calls for strikes lost their weight.
In
the process Kashmir became a consumer state. All goods come from India as we
produce nothing. Calls for strike are a loss to us the Kashmiris only, and to
none else. Educational institutions are shut down for students. We don’t have
super specialty educational institutions in the State, and we are lacking in
professional advanced institutions. Thousands of Kashmiri students having
sought admission in different educational institutions of India are getting
dissolved in wider Indian cultural milieu. Most of them do not return to
Kashmir. Shops and small scale industrial units remain closed and they have to
pay the interest of the bank loans. It
causes great financial loss to them. Artisans are deprived of their daily
earning owing to strike calls. Our strike calls have been going on for last two
decades and half but to the occupational forces this makes not an iota of
impact. It has to be remembered that civil disobedience is an art and a concerted
movement. If it is carried along right direction, it can disintegrate even the
mighty powers. But the very foundation of our movement is faulty and the entire
structure raised on it is faulty. We are torn by ego. We have seen with our own
eyes youngsters shedding their blood, and we have seen our women molested and
yet we stick to ego refusing to opt for unity and concreted effort. We have
forgotten the Quranic injunction:
“That the communities that do not rise to
change their condition can never find their condition changed.”
This article was published in'various newspapers including 'Kashmir Uzma', 'Daily Chattan', 'Weekly Pukaar', 'Weekly Shohrat' and 'Greater Kashmir' on 8th October 2013.